A female chimpanzee sits on a tree branch, plucking a blonde hair from the back of a male chimp. The caption turns field biology into marital suspicion: “Well, well, another blonde hair... conducting a little more ‘research’ with that Jane Goodall tramp?”[3]

Gary Larson’s 1987 Far Side cartoon drew an angry warning from the Jane Goodall Institute, but Jane Goodall herself liked the joke when she saw it. The flap faded into friendship, and Goodall later wrote an introduction for a Far Side collection.[1]

The cartoon appeared in August 1987, when Gary Larson’s single-panel world was already crowded with scheming animals, anxious scientists, and nature behaving like a very strange office.[2] This joke, though, used the name of a real scientist whose public identity was tied to the animals in the panel.

Goodall had become one of the world’s best-known primatologists through her work with wild chimpanzees at Gombe Stream National Park in Tanzania, research that helped make her name nearly inseparable from chimpanzee behavior and conservation.[1] To people protecting that reputation, Larson’s gag did not read like affectionate absurdity. It read like a public insult.

The response came as a warning letter to Larson’s syndicate. Later accounts describe it as a cease-and-desist threat, with possible legal action attached.[2] Larson recalled an indignant letter from an institute employee, later identified as an attorney, calling the cartoon “inexcusable” and “absolutely stupid,” with a vague suggestion that a lawsuit could follow.[3] Other summaries of the incident say Goodall’s representatives called the comic an “atrocity.”[1]

The Scientist Had Not Seen It Yet

Goodall herself was away in Africa when the complaint began, according to later accounts.[3] When she returned to the United States and saw the panel, she did not share the outrage. She found it funny.[2]

That reaction changed the life of the joke. Goodall asked that the matter be dropped, and the legal threat evaporated.[3] Larson later said he had not meant to wound her and was upset by the possibility that he had hurt someone he respected for her contributions to primatology.[3]

The misunderstanding fit oddly well with The Far Side itself. Larson’s strip often put animals, researchers, and ordinary human anxieties into the same absurd frame.[2] In this case, the absurdity escaped the drawing. A jealous chimp saw blonde hairs and imagined an affair. Institute staff saw reputational damage. Goodall saw the machinery of the joke.

From Complaint Letter to Endorsement

The aftermath was warmer than the warning letter suggested. Goodall and Larson developed a friendly connection after the controversy, and later accounts say the Jane Goodall Institute came to promote Larson’s work rather than treat him as an enemy.[2] The most lasting reversal was in print: Goodall wrote the introduction to one of Larson’s Far Side collections.[1]

The panel still works because the insult is delivered by a chimpanzee acting like a suspicious spouse, not by a narrator making an argument. The comedy depends on everyone misreading evidence: a hair, a famous researcher’s name, a word like “research,” and the strange dignity of two apes on a branch.

Outside the frame, the same thing happened in miniature. A cartoonist drew a chimp accusing Jane Goodall of impropriety. An attorney bristled. Goodall came back from the world of actual chimpanzees, looked at Larson’s ridiculous little scene, and let the joke stay on the branch.

Sources

  1. Jane Goodall, Wikipedia
  2. What Happened Between Gary Larson and Jane Goodall? The Far Side Cartoon Controversy Explained, Circular Symphony
  3. What happened with Gary Larson and Jane Goodall? The Far Side cartoon controversy almost led to the cartoonist being sued, Soap Central